Impact of pre-sarcopenia and sarcopenia on biological and functional outcomes in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study / Impacto de la presarcopenia y la sarcopenia en los resultados biológicos y funcionales en personas con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica: un estudio transversal

Introduction: The impact of pre-sarcopenia, sarcopenia on important clinical and biological outcomes in individuals with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have not been fully investigated. Objective: To analyze the impact of pre-sarcopenia and sarcopenia on balance, muscle mass, peripheral and respiratory muscle strength and inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers in individuals with COPD. Methods: sixty-one patients diagnosed with COPD were included, stratified into three groups: without sarcopenia (n = 33; 69 ± 6 years), with pre-sarcopenia (n = 15; 66 ± 6 years) and with sarcopenia (n = 13; 71 ± 7 years), according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. It was assessed respiratory muscle strength, through maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), handgrip strength (HGS) and body composition analysis with bioimpedance. Inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers were analysed from peripheral blood. Results: The prevalence of pre-sarcopenia and sarcopenia in individuals with COPD was 36% and 25%, respectively. Individuals with sarcopenia exhibit inferior muscle mass, peripheral muscle strength, respiratory muscle strength, and balance compared to their counterparts (p<0.05 for all). In addition, individuals with sarcopenia presented lower levels of protein oxidation (p=0.015) and higher levels of interleukin-1ɓ (p=0.035) compared to those without sarcopenia. Individuals with pre-sarcopenia presented lower levels of antioxidant activity (p=0.045) and higher levels of C-reactive protein (p=0.035). Conclusion: Individuals with COPD who have sarcopenia exhibit diminished muscle mass, impaired balance, and reduced peripheral and respiratory muscle strength in comparison to those with pre-sarcopenia or without sarcopenia. In addition, the presence of sarcopenia and pre-sarcopenia is probably linked by biological mechanisms related to systemic inflammation and oxidative stress.(AU)

Evaluation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by maximal inspiratory pressure and diaphragmatic excursion with ultrasound sonography.

BACKGROUND: Decreased respiratory muscle strength and muscle mass is key in diagnosing respiratory sarcopenia. However, the role of reduced diaphragm activity, expressed as the maximal level of diaphragmatic excursion (DEmax), in diagnosing respiratory sarcopenia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize patients with COPD and low DEmax and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), a measure of inspiratory muscle strength, and assess the role of DEmax in respiratory sarcopenia. METHODS: Patients with COPD underwent spirometry, exercise tolerance (VO2peak) test, and MIP measurement. DEmax and sternocleidomastoid thickness at the maximal inspiratory level (TscmMIL) were assessed using ultrasound sonography. RESULTS: Overall, 58 patients with COPD (median age, 76 years; median %FEV1, 51.3 %) were included, 28 of whom showed a %MIP of ≥80 %, defined as having preserved MIP. Based on the %MIP of 80 % and median value of DEmax (48.0 mm) as thresholds, the patients were stratified into four groups: both-high (n = 18), %MIP-alone low (n = 11), DEmax-alone low (n = 10), and both-low (n = 19) groups. The both-low group exhibited the lowest %FEV1, Δinspiratory capacity, VO2peak, and TscmMIL, and these values were significantly lower than those of the both-high group. Except for %FEV1, these values were significantly lower in the both-low group than in the %MIP-alone low group despite adjusting DEmax level for body mass index. CONCLUSION: Measuring DEmax along with MIP can characterize patients with COPD, reduced exercise capacity, and decreased accessory respiratory muscle mass and can help diagnose respiratory sarcopenia.

Normal values for maximal respiratory pressures in children and adolescents: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The non-invasive assessment of maximal respiratory pressures (MRP) reflects the strength of the respiratory muscles. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the studies which have established normative values for MRP in healthy children and adolescents and to synthesize these values through a meta-analysis. METHODS: The searches were conducted until October 2023 in the following databases: ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SciELO, and Web of Science. Articles that determined normative values and/or reference equations for maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) in children and adolescents published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish regardless of the year of publication were included. Two reviewers selected titles and abstracts, in case of conflict, a third reviewer was consulted. Articles that presented sufficient data were included to conduct the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Initially, 252 studies were identified, 28 studies were included in the systematic review and 19 in the meta-analysis. The sample consisted of 5798 individuals, and the MIP and MEP values were stratified by sex and age groups of 4-11 and 12-19 years. Values from females 4-11 years were: 65.8 cmH2O for MIP and 72.8 cmH2O for MEP, and for males, 75.4 cmH2O for MIP and 84.0 cmH2O for MEP. In the 12-19 age group, values for females were 82.1 cmH2O for MIP and 90.0 cmH2O for MEP, and for males, they were 95.0 cmH2O for MIP and 105.7 cmH2O for MEP. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests normative values for MIP and MEP in children and adolescents based on 19 studies.

Maximal Respiratory Pressure Reference Equations in Healthy Adults and Cut-off Points for Defining Respiratory Muscle Weakness

Introduction: Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (PImax/PEmax) reference equations obtained in healthy people are needed to correctly interpret respiratory muscle strength. Currently, no clear cut-off points defining respiratory muscle weakness are available. We aimed to establish sex-specific reference equations for PImax/PEmax in a large sample of healthy adults and to objectively determine cut-off points for respiratory muscle weakness. Methods: A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted across 14 Spanish centres. Healthy non-smoking volunteers aged 18–80 years stratified by sex and age were recruited. PImax/PEmax were assessed using uniform methodology according to international standards. Multiple linear regressions were used to obtain reference equations. Cut-off points for respiratory muscle weakness were established by using T-scores. Results: The final sample consisted of 610 subjects (314 females; 48 [standard deviation, SD: 17] years). Reference equations for PImax/PEmax included body mass index and a squared term of the age as independent variables for both sexes (p<0.01). Cut-off points for respiratory muscle weakness based on T-scores ≥2.5 SD below the peak mean value achieved at a young age were: 62 and 83cmH2O for PImax and 81 and 109cmH2O for PEmax in females and males, respectively. Conclusion: These reference values, based on the largest dataset collected in a European population to date using uniform methodology, help identify cut-off points for respiratory muscle weakness in females and males. These data will help to better identify the presence of respiratory muscle weakness and to determine indications for interventions to improve respiratory muscle function. (AU)

Effects of Modified Diaphragmatic Training on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire Score, Diaphragmatic Excursion, and Maximum Inspiratory Pressure in Adults with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After COVID-19: A Single-Blinded Randomized Control.

BACKGROUND: Although diaphragmatic training has been shown to improve gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms, its effectiveness in adults with GERD after COVID-19 has not been evaluated. This study examined the effectiveness of modified diaphragmatic training (MDT) on GERD questionnaire (GERDQ) score, diaphragmatic excursion, and maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) in adults with GERD after COVID-19. METHODS: This single-blinded randomized control trial was conducted at Persahabatan Hospital from February to April 2023. The medical records of 364 patients with persistent gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated; among these potential participants, 302 had symptoms before, and 62 after, COVID-19 infection. Fifty of these patients fulfilled the study inclusion and exclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 25) or control (n = 25) groups. Four weeks of diaphragmatic training were followed by MDT or standard diaphragmatic training. A follow-up assessment was conducted 30 days after the beginning of the training. RESULTS: The GERDQ score was significantly decreased in the pre-post-intervention group (10.44 ± 2.00 vs 1.84 ± 2.17) and the control group (8.64 ± 0.57 vs 3.32 ± 1.49), with p < 0.001. The intervention group showed significant improvements in the right diaphragmatic excursion (RDE) (44% vs 11.87%), left diaphragmatic excursion (LDE) (46.61% vs 13.62%), and MIP (75.26% vs 23.97%) compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: MDT in adults after COVID-19 with GERD enhanced diaphragmatic excursion and MIP and decreased symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux by 8.60 points of GERDQ. Respiratory symptoms and other side effects were comparable between the groups.

Maximal Respiratory Pressure Reference Equations in Healthy Adults and Cut-off Points for Defining Respiratory Muscle Weakness.

INTRODUCTION: Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (PImax/PEmax) reference equations obtained in healthy people are needed to correctly interpret respiratory muscle strength. Currently, no clear cut-off points defining respiratory muscle weakness are available. We aimed to establish sex-specific reference equations for PImax/PEmax in a large sample of healthy adults and to objectively determine cut-off points for respiratory muscle weakness. METHODS: A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted across 14 Spanish centres. Healthy non-smoking volunteers aged 18-80 years stratified by sex and age were recruited. PImax/PEmax were assessed using uniform methodology according to international standards. Multiple linear regressions were used to obtain reference equations. Cut-off points for respiratory muscle weakness were established by using T-scores. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 610 subjects (314 females; 48 [standard deviation, SD: 17] years). Reference equations for PImax/PEmax included body mass index and a squared term of the age as independent variables for both sexes (p<0.01). Cut-off points for respiratory muscle weakness based on T-scores ≥2.5 SD below the peak mean value achieved at a young age were: 62 and 83cmH2O for PImax and 81 and 109cmH2O for PEmax in females and males, respectively. CONCLUSION: These reference values, based on the largest dataset collected in a European population to date using uniform methodology, help identify cut-off points for respiratory muscle weakness in females and males. These data will help to better identify the presence of respiratory muscle weakness and to determine indications for interventions to improve respiratory muscle function.

Impacto de un Programa de Recuperación Funcional en Músculos Ventilatorios y Apendiculares en Pacientes Post-ventilación Mecánica por COVID-19 / Impact of a Functional Recovery Program on Ventilatory and Appendicular Muscles in Patients Post-mechanical Ventilation for COVID-19

Los pacientes con COVID-19 subsidiarios de ventilación mecánica (VM), evolucionan con consecuencias funcionales en la musculatura ventilatoria y apendicular que no necesariamente se abordan de manera diferenciada. El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar el impacto de un programa de recuperación funcional en estos pacientes y determinar si las intervenciones afectan de manera diferenciada a las funciones ventilatorias y musculatura apendicular, utilizando pruebas de bajo costo. Se evaluaron 47 pacientes con COVID-19 que estuvieron en VM. Posterior a una espirometría basal se les realizó; presión inspiratoria máxima (PIMáx), fuerza de prensión palmar (FPP), prueba de pararse y sentarse (PPS) y Prueba de caminata en 6 minutos (PC6m), antes y después del plan de intervención. Este programa incluyó ejercicios aeróbicos y de fuerza supervisados por dos sesiones semanales de 60 minutos durante 3 meses. Después del programa, se observaron mejoras significativas en la capacidad vital forzada (CVF), el volumen espiratorio en el primer segundo (VEF1) y la PIMáx. Se encontraron relaciones significativas entre estas mediciones y la distancia recorrida de la PC6m, la FPP y la PPS. En conclusión, el programa de recuperación funcional en pacientes con COVID-19 que requirieron VM, beneficia tanto la función ventilatoria como la fuerza muscular apendicular. Las pruebas de fuerza muscular apendicular pueden ser útiles para evaluar la recuperación ya que pueden entregar información diferenciada de sus rendimientos. Por último, se necesita más investigación para comprender mejor la respuesta de estos pacientes a la rehabilitación.

SUMMARY: Patients with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) evolve with functional consequences in the ventilatory and appendicular muscles that are not necessarily addressed in a differentiated manner. The objective of this research was to evaluate the impact of a functional recovery program in these patients and determine if the interventions differentially affect ventilatory functions and appendicular muscles, using low- cost tests. 47 patients with COVID-19 who were on MV were evaluated. After a baseline spirometry, they were performed; maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), handgrip strength (HGS), sit to stand test (STST) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT), before and after the intervention plan. This program included supervised aerobic and strength exercises for two weekly 60-minute sessions for 3 months. After the program, significant improvements were observed in forced vital capacity (FVC), expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and MIP. Significant relationships were found between these measurements and the distance traveled of the 6MWT, the HGS and the STST. In conclusion, the functional recovery program in patients with COVID-19 who required MV benefits both ventilatory function and appendicular muscle strength. Appendicular muscle strength tests can be useful to evaluate recovery since they can provide differentiated information about your performances. Finally, more research is needed to better understand the response of these patients to rehabilitation.

Maximal expiratory pressure compared with maximal expiratory pressure during induced cough as a predictor of extubation failure.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance of maximal expiratory pressure with maximal expiratory pressure during induced cough for predicting extubation failure within 72 hours in patients who completed a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). METHODS: The study was conducted between October 2018 and September 2019. All patients aged over 18 years admitted to the intensive care unit who required invasive mechanical ventilation for over 48 hours and successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial were included. The maximal expiratory pressure was assessed with a unidirectional valve for 40 seconds, and verbal encouragement was given. The maximal expiratory pressure during induced cough was measured with slow instillation of 2mL of a 0.9% saline solution. The primary outcome variable was extubation failure. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included, of which 43 (54%) were male. Twenty-two patients [27.5% (95%CI 18.9 - 38.1)] failed extubation within 72 hours. Differences were observed in the maximal expiratory pressure during induced cough between the group who failed extubation, with a median of 0cmH2O (P25-75: 0 - 90), and the group without extubation failure, with a median of 120cmH2O (P25-75: 73 - 120); p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: In patients who completed a spontaneous breathing trial, the maximal expiratory pressure during induced cough had a higher diagnostic performance for predicting extubation failure within 72 hours.Clinicaltrials.gov Registry: NCT04356625.

Cambios en el índice de stress y presión inspiratoria pico posterior a neumoperitoneo en colecistectomía laparoscópica / Changes in Stress Index and Peak Inspiratory Pressure after Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Introducción: es bien sabido que el neumoperitoneo en cirugía laparoscópica afecta tanto al sistema cardiovascular como al sistema respiratorio, pero no se entiende por completo el grado en el que debemos modificar los parámetros ventilatorios para mini-mizar las complicaciones debido a la insuflación del neumoperitoneo. Estos cambios in-cluyen disminución de la distensibilidad y mayores presiones inspiratorias pico.

Abstract Background: it is well known that pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery affects both cardiovascular and respiratory system, but it is not fully understood yet the degree in which we have to make changes in the ventilatory settings to minimize the complica-tions due to insufflation of peritoneum, changes including impaired compliance and hig-her peak inspiratory.

Maximal respiratory pressures: Measurements at functional residual capacity in individuals with different health conditions using a digital manometer.

BACKGROUND: Measuring maximal respiratory pressure is a widely used method of investigating the strength of inspiratory and expiratory muscles. OBJECTIVES: To compare inspiratory pressures obtained at functional residual capacity (FRC) with measures at residual volume (RV), and expiratory pressures obtained at FRC with measures at total lung capacity (TLC) in individuals with different health conditions: post-COVID-19, COPD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), heart failure (CHF), and stroke; and to compare the mean differences between measurements at FRC and RV/TLC among the groups. METHODS: Inspiratory and expiratory pressures were obtained randomly at different lung volumes. Mixed factorial analysis of covariance with repeated measures was used to compare measurements at different lung volumes within and among groups. RESULTS: Seventy-five individuals were included in the final analyses (15 individuals with each health condition). Maximal inspiratory pressures at FRC were lower than RV [mean difference (95% CI): 11.3 (5.8, 16.8); 8.4 (2.3, 14.5); 11.1 (5.5, 16.7); 12.8 (7.1, 18.4); 8.0 (2.6, 13.4) for COVID-19, COPD, IPF, CHF, and stroke, respectively] and maximal expiratory pressures at FRC were lower than TLC [mean difference (95% CI): 51.9 (37.4, 55.5); 60.9 (44.2, 77.7); 62.9 (48.1, 77.8); 58.0 (43.9, 73.8); 57.2 (42.9, 71.6) for COVID-19, COPD, IPF, CHF, and stroke, respectively]. All mean differences were similar among groups. CONCLUSION: Although inspiratory and expiratory pressures at FRC were lower than measures obtained at RV/TLC for the five groups of health conditions, the mean differences between measurements at different lung volumes were similar among groups, which raises the discussion about the influence of the viscoelastic properties of the lungs on maximal respiratory pressure.

Effects of high-intensity inspiratory muscle warm-up on inspiratory muscle strength and accessory inspiratory muscle activity.

This study aimed to determine the effects of work-matched moderate-intensity and high-intensity inspiratory muscle warm-up (IMW) on inspiratory muscle strength and accessory inspiratory muscle activity. Eleven healthy men performed three IMWs at different intensities, namely, placebo, moderate-intensity, and high-intensity, set, respectively, at 15 %, 40 %, and 80 % of maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (MIP). MIP was measured before and after IMW. Electromyography (EMG) was recorded for the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) and intercostal muscles (IC) during IMW. MIP increased significantly in the moderate-intensity condition (104.2 ± 5.1 %, p < 0.05) and high-intensity condition (106.5 ± 6.2 %, p < 0.01) after IMW. The EMG amplitudes of the SCM and IC during IMW were significantly higher in the order of high-intensity, moderate-intensity, and placebo conditions. There was a significant correlation between changes in MIP and EMG amplitude of the SCM (r = 0.60, p < 0.01) and IC (r = 0.47, p < 0.01) during IMW. These findings suggest that high-intensity IMW increases neuromuscular activity in the accessory inspiratory muscles, which may improve inspiratory muscle strength.

Inspiratory Muscle Training Improves Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Without Increasing Performance in Elite Swimmers.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on the maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (MIP) and performance of elite swimmers. METHODS: Eight participants performed a 3000-m swimming test (T-3000), followed by blood lactate measurements at 1 and 5 minutes postexercise.. The testing protocol was carried out before and after 6 weeks of IMT, in which a high-volume IMT group (HV-IMT) (n = 4) performed IMT twice a day-in the morning in a seated position and in the afternoon in a concurrent session of IMT and core muscle training. Also, a low-volume IMT group (LV-IMT) (n = 4) performed IMT in the morning session only. RESULTS: After the intervention, both groups improved their MIP, HV-IMT (132.75 [27.42] to 156.75 [21.88] cmH2O; P = .010; d = 0.967) and LV-IMT (149.25 [22.82] to 171.50 [23.74] cmH2O; P = .013; d = 0.955), without a significant difference between groups (P = .855). Regarding swimming performance, there were no changes between groups in the T-3000 (P = .472) or lactate removal rate (P = .104). CONCLUSION: IMT increased inspiratory muscle strength in elite swimmers, but there was no association or meaningful impact on swimming performance.

Relationship between inspiratory muscle strength and balance in women: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: There is scarce evidence on changes at the functional level associated with the respiratory area in women. This study aims to analyse the relationship between inspiratory muscle strength and balance in women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, the sample consisted of groups according to the results obtained in the balance test. Inspiratory muscle weakness was defined as maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) ≤ 80% of the predictive value. MIP was carried out using through a mouthpiece, with an electronic manometer. Logistic regression model was used to examine if MIP predicts balance. RESULTS: 159 women participated in the study. Approximately 20% of them achieved balance ≤ 2 seconds and 18% presented MIP≤80%. MIP was associated with the time achieved in the one-leg support test. Subjects with MIP ≤ 80% of the predictive value show 3 times more risk of having a lower performance in the balance test (OR = 3.26). CONCLUSIONS: Inspiratory muscle weakness is associated with deficient balance in this sample. It shows the need for multidimensional assessment and rehabilitation strategies for patients identified as having MIP weakness and/or balance disorders.

A Prospective Study of 73 Patients to Compare Forward Head Angle, Forward Shoulder Angle, Maximal Inspiratory Pressure, and Self-Reported Breathing-Related Symptoms Before and After Open-Heart Surgery.

BACKGROUND Patients who undergo open-heart surgery often experience widespread musculoskeletal and pulmonary complications. These can interfere with their functioning, resulting in soft tissue changes, worsening postural changes, and poor respiratory performance. Therefore, the prospective study aimed to compare forward head angle (FHA) and forward shoulder angle (FSA), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and self-reported breathing dysfunction before and after open-heart surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS In a prospective observational study of 106 patients, men and women scheduled for open-heart surgery were enrolled. Prior to surgery and before discharge from the hospital, all patients were required to assess FHA and FSA using 2-dimensional motion analysis software, MIP using a respiratory pressure meter, and breathing dysfunction using the 25-item Self Evaluation of Breathing Questionnaire (SEBQ). Paired t test was used to compare differences between before and after surgery. To evaluate associations, logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS Of the 106 patients recruited, 73 completed the study. FHA (-Δ6.55±4.77, P.

Validation of the Single Breath Count Test for Assessment of Inspiratory Muscle Strength in Healthy Subjects and People with Neuromuscular Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the single breath count test (SBCT) against volitional measures of respiratory muscle function in healthy subjects and people with neuromuscular disorders (NMD; n = 100 per group). METHODS: Testing comprised upright and supine SBCT, forced vital capacity (FVC), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP). Predictability of FVC by SBCT was assessed using logarithmic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristics curves were used to identify SBCT thresholds for lung restriction (FVC < 80% predicted), inspiratory muscle weakness (MIP < 60 cmH2O), and indication for non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in NMD patients. RESULTS: In both groups, SBCT showed moderate correlation with FVC. In patients, SBCT values were also correlated with MIP and SNIP. Strength of correlations was similar with supine and upright SBCT which accounted for 23.7% of FVC variance in healthy individuals (44.5% in patients). Predictive thresholds of upright SBCT were < 27 for MIP < 60 cmH2O (sensitivity 0.61/specificity 0.86), <39 for NIV indication (0.92/0.46), and <41 for FVC < 80% predicted (0.89/0.62). CONCLUSION: The SBCT is positively correlated with spirometry. It predicts both lung restriction and NIV indication in NMD patients. The SBCT allows for remote monitoring and may substitute for spirometry/manometry if appropriate devices are unavailable.

New reference values for maximum respiratory pressures in healthy Brazilian children following guidelines recommendations: A regional study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine reference values for maximum static respiratory pressures in healthy children from a Brazilian region, following recommendations of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the Brazilian Society of Pneumology and Tisiology (SBPT). METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with healthy children (6 to 11 years) of both sexes. The maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures (PImax and PEmax, respectively) were measured using a digital manometer. Each child performed a minimum of three and a maximum of five maneuvers; three acceptable and reproducible maneuvers were considered for analysis. Minimum time for each maneuver was 1.5 seconds, with a one-second plateau, and one minute of rest between them. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was conducted for PImax and PEmax, considering correlations between independent variables: age, weight, and sex. RESULTS: We included 121 children (62 girls [51%]). Boys reached higher values for maximum respiratory pressures than girls. Respiratory pressures increased with age showing moderate effect sizes (PImax: f = 0.36; PEmax: f = 0.30) between the stratified age groups (6-7, 8-9, and 10-11 years). Age and sex were included in the PImax equation (PImax = 24.630 + 7.044 x age (years) + 13.161 x sex; R2 = 0.189). PEmax equations were built considering age for girls and weight for boys [PEmax (girls) = 55.623 + 4.698 x age (years) and PEmax (boys) = 82.617 + 0.612 x weight (kg); R2 = 0.068]. CONCLUSIONS: This study determined new reference equations for maximal respiratory pressures in healthy Brazilian children, following ERS and SBPT recommendations.

The respiratory effects of a Pilates method protocol: Randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the respiratory effects of a Pilates method (PM) protocol in adult women. DESIGN: Single-blind randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: Healthy women were randomized into two groups using the Random.org online tool: a Pilates group (PG) (n = 33) and a control group (CG) (n = 29). PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two healthy women, aged 18-44 years, sedentary or irregularly active B (as defined by the international physical activity questionnaire [IPAQ]). The intervention consisted of 16 sessions of PM. protocol twice a week for the PG. The CG without intervention. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The variables evaluated were maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), peak expiratory flow (PEF), tidal volume (TV), respiratory frequency (RF), minute volume (MV), and slow vital capacity (SVC). RESULTS: The results showed significant evidence of the beneficial respiratory effects of the PM protocol when the PG was compared with the CG: increased MIP (p = 0.001), and a significant increase in TV (p = 0,047). CONCLUSION: The PM protocol used in this study may be effective for respiratory muscle strength because it improved MIP and TV. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-5b6wc3.

Comparison of international and Japanese predictive equations for maximal respiratory mouth pressures.

Respiratory muscle weakness has attracted attention because sarcopenia and respiratory muscle dysfunction may play a key role in the development of respiratory failure. To evaluate respiratory muscle strength appropriately, individual factors such as sex, age, body size, and ethnicity should be considered. This study aimed to compare equations available in Japan and other countries for predicting respiratory muscle strength. We tested 21 equations for maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and 17 for maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) for each sex (76 equations in total) in 159 normal, healthy subjects. We observed wide variations in the overall agreement among the MIP and MEP equations. Some equations showed a proper normal distribution, with median values of almost 100%, and the Japanese equations released in 1997 generally showed the best distributions of both %MIP and %MEP. We can conclude that it is better to use Japanese equations when evaluating respiratory muscle strength in Japanese subjects.

Relationships between diaphragm ultrasound, spirometry, and respiratory mouth pressures in children.

Diaphragm ultrasound (DUS) is a noninvasive method of evaluating the diaphragm's structure and function. This study explored the relationships between DUS, spirometry, and respiratory mouth pressures in 10 healthy children (median age: 11 [range: 7-14 years]; 5 females, 5 males). Thickening fraction correlated with maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) (Spearman's rho [rs] = 0.64, p = 0.05). During quiet breaths, excursion time correlated with MIP (rs = 0.78, p = 0.01) while velocity correlated with maximal expiratory pressure (rs = -0.82, p = 0.01). During deep breaths, MIP correlated with excursion (rs = 0.64, p = 0.05) and time (rs = 0.87, p = 0.01). Excursion time during deep breaths also correlated with forced vital capacity (rs = 0.65, p = 0.04). Our findings suggest that DUS parameters are closely related to spirometry and respiratory mouth pressures in healthy children and further support the use of DUS as a noninvasive method of respiratory assessment.